A scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of a particular topic by synthesizing the breadth of evidence currently available. They systematically map the literature available on a topic and are intended to provide readers with key concepts and theories, important insights regarding the topic of interest, knowledge gaps in the field, sources of evidence, and a summary of how research has been conducted.
They differ from systematic reviews in that systematic reviews often cover larger, more homogeneous bodies of evidence, which often include more specific research questions, methodological appraisals, risk of bias assessments, and meta-analyses. Scoping reviews provide a comprehensive overview to address broader review questions than traditionally more specific systematic reviews of effectiveness or qualitative evidence.
Systematic reviews are useful for answering clearly defined questions:
Scoping reviews are useful for answering much broader questions:
Scoping Review - protocol guidance
Learn more about the methodological guidance for conducting a scoping review:
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis chapter on conducting a scoping review
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
PRISMA-ScR - PRISMA checklist for writing a scoping review